the following paper makes quite a vociferous attack against economic theory using rational addiction as an example. it argues that economic theorists are liable to the same charges of obscurantism etc., discussed by Kevin below with relation to some of the continental philosophers. i doubt many economists would agree with their main thrust but interesting to hear counter-arguments all the same.
here
2 comments:
Interesting blog here on "Philosophy and Economics":
http://philecon.wordpress.com/tag/conference-announcement/
This link is shorter:
http://philecon.wordpress.com/
Post a Comment