Laurie Santos: A monkey economy as irrational as ours | Video on TED.com
Fascinating talk looking at financial behaviour by monkeys & how similar it is to humans (for example loss aversion).
Showing posts with label evolution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label evolution. Show all posts
Wednesday, January 05, 2011
Sunday, September 12, 2010
You say you want evolution?
Posted by
Kevin Denny
This essay argues for taking an evolutionary approach to, well, everything and has a pop at both neo-classical and behavioural economics in the process.
Saturday, May 08, 2010
Ask Carole: an evolutionary agony aunt just for you
Posted by
Kevin Denny
In some previous posts I offered some insights from psychology into affairs of the heart. Just trying to be helpful. Unbeknownst to me that fine newspaper The Guardian has a regular column by an evolutionary agony aunt using peer reviewed research to shed light on all sorts of relationship issues that I would blanche at discussing. She's the real deal.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/series/ask-carole
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/series/ask-carole
Saturday, March 27, 2010
Cute babies, anxious daddys, cheating moms
Posted by
Kevin Denny
Investment? Under uncertainty? Thats economics isn't it? Well yes but we don't have a monopoly of the subject and evolutionary biologists have long been interested in parental investment in offspring. Economists could do with looking at some of this stuff. The uncertainty arises because males can't be sure the little one's are actually their offspring. Because some females, well, you know...
So whats a guy to do? Well one theory is that males use facial resemblance: if the baby looks like you (& not the legendary milkman) then the return to your investment, in the sense of passing your genes on, is higher. The paper below test this theory and related ideas.
Are parents' perceptions of offspring facial resemblance consistent with actual resemblance? Effects on parental investment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31 (2010) 7–15, Alexandra Alvergne, Charlotte Faurie, Michel Raymond
So whats a guy to do? Well one theory is that males use facial resemblance: if the baby looks like you (& not the legendary milkman) then the return to your investment, in the sense of passing your genes on, is higher. The paper below test this theory and related ideas.
Are parents' perceptions of offspring facial resemblance consistent with actual resemblance? Effects on parental investment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31 (2010) 7–15, Alexandra Alvergne, Charlotte Faurie, Michel Raymond
Wednesday, May 27, 2009
Sympathy and similarity: The evolutionary dynamics of cooperation
Posted by
Michael99
If we are to cooperate with those who carry our genes how can we do this?
The answer from commentary this week in PNAS is that we need to have a system for tagging people:
"The first to investigate a tag for altruism was W. D. Hamilton (2). He conceived
what he called a supergene, able to produce (i) a distinctive phenotypic
trait, (ii) the faculty to recognize the trait in others, and (iii) the propensity to
direct benefits toward bearers of that trait, even though this entails a fitness cost."
One way to tag genetically related people to cooperate with is to judge how similar a person's face is to your own according to a study last year in 'Evolution and Human Behaviour'.
The answer from commentary this week in PNAS is that we need to have a system for tagging people:
"The first to investigate a tag for altruism was W. D. Hamilton (2). He conceived
what he called a supergene, able to produce (i) a distinctive phenotypic
trait, (ii) the faculty to recognize the trait in others, and (iii) the propensity to
direct benefits toward bearers of that trait, even though this entails a fitness cost."
One way to tag genetically related people to cooperate with is to judge how similar a person's face is to your own according to a study last year in 'Evolution and Human Behaviour'.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)