Pages

Saturday, December 03, 2022

OpenaI meets the blog: part 2

 Like a lot of people I have been experimenting with the openAI playground. Below a few examples and am interested to hearing thoughts about what it can do. Obviously a lot has been written about the image and coding capacities but I am mostly interesting in its ability to generate text. I don't have any expertise in AI and I am posting purely as someone trying to figure out the implications of this technology being made so easily available for my areas of research and teaching. My brief impressions so far is that the technology is sufficiently advanced to be able to write essays in my area that would be very solid provided the questions were on material with a solid amount of online references to draw from. Anyone teaching courses being assessed by essays is going to have to think about this but I think that has been the case for several years in any case. It could also do very well specified scoping reviews and summarise the papers but I wouldn't trust it without significant human input. I definitely don't think it will replace research assistants etc., and it might make the role of junior researchers more valuable by increasing the value of the human element. Some of its summaries are uncannily good and some look like they are just winging it and it is quite easy to lead it into a path where it is being overconfident. I was impressed by its ability to find and summarise papers on ethics of nudging (posted here) but I have not come away with a major sense of the tasks I engage with having been fundamentally changed but open to conversation. Update: I also went to track down the papers it found and it turns out they were not actually papers but just incredibly plausible titles which is a learning experience on my side.

 

Could you translate the abstract of my paper linked here into French please https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioural-public-policy/article/nudge-forgood/06BC9E9032521954E8325798390A998A Une « poussée » est un concept apparucemment en politique publique qui combine une certaine forme de paternalisme et des choix libres. Il sagit de la manipulation directe des choix des individus pour leur bien, sans les contraindre à prendre unecision particulière. Ce concept est largement utilisé par les gouvernements pour améliorer la santé publique, l'environnement, le bien-être et l'économie. Dans cet article, nous discutons de la manière dont le « nudge » peut être utilisé pour le bien et nous insisterons sur le besoin d'une plus grande responsabilité et d'une plus grande transparence dans le processus de mise en œuvre des « nudges ». Nous proposons également des mesures pour garantir que les « nudges » sont imposés de manière éthique et responsable.

Are there any areas in my paper below that you think should be further developed https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioural-public-policy/article/nudge-forgood/06BC9E9032521954E8325798390A998A Yes, there are a few areas in this paper that could be further developed. For example, the paper could provide more information on the effectiveness of different types of nudges and how they vary in different contexts. Additionally, the paper could explore the ethical implications of using nudges to influence behavior and how these implications might vary depending on the context. Finally, the paper could discuss the potential for nudges to be used in other public policy areas, such as environmental or health policy. These are just a few possible suggestions for areas that could be further developed in the paper.

Write about prospect theory in the style of a shakespeare sonnet please Oh prospect theory, thou art yet so strange, Thy logic is so oft seen to derange; Though many would thy science quickly change, Tis still, a thought that does so much arrange. Thy people do respond to losses more, Than gains can ever hope to them restore; The value of a thing, they oft ignore, And so, thy theory does so much explore. Thou hast shown us much, when risks do abound, And what is safe, and what does bring us down; Thy loss-aversion's grip, can oft astound, And so, our choices thou dost always sound. Though prospect theory, thou art not complete, Thou still dost guide us when we do compete; And so, thy power, we must not underestimate, For such decisions thou dost so create.

The following is a conversation with an AI assistant. The assistant is helpful, creative, clever, and very friendly. Human: Hello, who are you? AI: I am an AI created by OpenAI. How can I help you today? Human: looking for thoughts on my paper. AI: Sure, I'd be happy to help. What kind of paper is it? Human: Abstract Insights from the behavioural sciences are increasingly used by governments and other organizations worldwide to ‘nudge’ people to make better decisions. Furthermore, a large philosophical literature has emerged on the ethical considerations on nudging human behaviour that has presented key challenges for the area, but is regularly omitted from discussion of policy design and administration. We present and discuss FORGOOD, an ethics framework that synthesizes the debate on the ethics of nudging in a memorable mnemonic. It suggests that nudgers should consider seven core ethical dimensions: Fairness, Openness, Respect, Goals, Opinions, Options and Delegation. The framework is designed to capture the key considerations in the philosophical debate about nudging human behaviour, while also being accessible for use in a range of public policy settings, as well as training. AI: This is a great paper and it looks like you have done a thorough job in exploring the ethical considerations of nudging. However, I suggest that you consider adding a practical example of how the framework works in policy settings to demonstrate its utility. You could also explore how nudging technologies can be used to influence mass behaviour and how this might be ethically problematic. Additionally, I recommend looking into how the FORGOOD framework can be applied in other contexts beyond policy making, such as in business and marketing. Human: what would a good business example? AI: A good example of how the FORGOOD framework can be applied in business settings would be to examine how businesses use nudging techniques to influence customers to make purchasing decisions. For instance, businesses could design certain advertisements and promotions that frame a specific product in a positive light and make it seem more attractive than other products. They should also consider fairness, openness, respect, goals, opinions, options, and delegation when designing these campaigns. Additionally, businesses may be creating nudges without realizing it - think about how design features such as color and layout of websites can influence a customer's purchase decision. Taking into account the ethical implications of creating these nudges is essential. Human: are there dimensions other than the seven we mentioned that are important? AI: Yes, there are other important dimensions to consider. For example, cultural awareness is essential when designing nudges in different contexts. Nudges should be crafted to fit the needs of a specific cultural context, taking into account local norms, values, and beliefs. Additionally, it is important to understand the power dynamics related to the situation, as nudging strategies can be used to manipulate or control the behaviour of certain members of society.

No comments:

Post a Comment