tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38545607.post6869912494724260020..comments2024-03-09T10:26:48.789+00:00Comments on economics, psychology, policy: Nudge DatabaseEmma Watsonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11466193733741012673noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38545607.post-26609711607954807992014-10-20T20:15:18.695+00:002014-10-20T20:15:18.695+00:00thanks a lot for this listthanks a lot for this listAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14777336695085149108noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38545607.post-1069773635762807942014-10-09T03:25:39.946+00:002014-10-09T03:25:39.946+00:00I like nudge 2,answering and putting the amount of...I like nudge 2,answering and putting the amount of miles in the beginning of the form rather at the end.hervebrounoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38545607.post-18674540259381404982013-12-30T21:02:39.439+00:002013-12-30T21:02:39.439+00:00You're correct Mark, thanks for catching that....You're correct Mark, thanks for catching that. Updated with the correct version now.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10290073721086163656noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38545607.post-81349851293962317872013-12-30T15:01:40.949+00:002013-12-30T15:01:40.949+00:00Isn't the graph reversed on number 2? It look...Isn't the graph reversed on number 2? It looks like signing at the end caused more honesty (i.e. higher mileage reported) which conflicts with the text . . . . Mark Waserhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04953566143956154534noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38545607.post-74735027321919558632013-11-08T09:31:58.047+00:002013-11-08T09:31:58.047+00:00thanks !
thanks ! <br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38545607.post-13463178823922717922013-05-05T09:38:48.956+00:002013-05-05T09:38:48.956+00:00Just want to thank you for putting this together -...Just want to thank you for putting this together - good job!Chris Nhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00186201015703907655noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38545607.post-83483646853826727962013-04-17T12:31:12.753+00:002013-04-17T12:31:12.753+00:00Hi Max,
I'd like to include the hot-cold empa...Hi Max,<br /><br />I'd like to include the hot-cold empathy gaps but so far I haven't found a nudge that addresses them specifically. Did you know Loewenstein and his handsome mustache are coming to Stirling in September for a talk?<br />http://www.stir.ac.uk/events/calendarofevents/siresymposium/Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10290073721086163656noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38545607.post-43604788149181808542013-04-10T17:03:03.766+00:002013-04-10T17:03:03.766+00:00Hey Mark,
Do you think reducing the hot-cold empa...Hey Mark, <br />Do you think reducing the hot-cold empathy gap (Loewenstein) could be seen as a nudge that fits in your list? I just thought about why removing trays in cafeterias (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/29/nyregion/29tray.html) leads to less food waste and thought that if people have a tray they base their decision about how much food to take on their visceral state of hunger before they have eaten anything. Without trays they make this decision of how much to take in steps and always with an 'updated state' of hunger.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07793274326479694537noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38545607.post-79151043994619086812013-03-24T10:39:20.969+00:002013-03-24T10:39:20.969+00:00Congratulations and thanks for this wonderful list...Congratulations and thanks for this wonderful list.Nick Naumofhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11683307668919327677noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38545607.post-62248827543622222482013-03-23T08:20:49.630+00:002013-03-23T08:20:49.630+00:00I can't see why 3. is a nudge - it's basic...I can't see why 3. is a nudge - it's basically about economic incentives (it could be about nudging if it compared effect of lottery with that of payment).<br /><br />4. is under-described. See our list of nudges: http://www.inudgeyou.com/financial-nudge-the-classic-example-of-save-more-tomorrow/Pelle Guldborg Hansenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13950558064017543951noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38545607.post-88542504333531135002013-03-22T18:25:44.923+00:002013-03-22T18:25:44.923+00:00Thanks for the heads up :)Thanks for the heads up :)Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10290073721086163656noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38545607.post-57608273681769973932013-03-21T10:14:37.210+00:002013-03-21T10:14:37.210+00:00Great job!
Not sure if it fits very well in the &...Great job!<br /><br />Not sure if it fits very well in the 'nudge' list, but here's an interesting finding. In charitable giving, seed money are the funds received prior to eliciting donations from the public. In a field experiment, List and Lucking-Reiley [2002] found that increasing the seed money from 10% to 67% of the campaign goal produced a nearly sixfold increase in contributions. The authors posit that seed money (1) signal charity credibility and reliability and (2) stand as social proof. I noticed Wikipedia does the same when they ask for donations.<br /><br />The paper is called: 'The effects of seed money and refunds on charitable giving: Experimental evidence from a university capital campaign', by List and Lucking-Reiley [2002].Cristina Rabojnoreply@blogger.com